Marijuana https://truthvoice.com Wed, 22 May 2019 11:19:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.2 https://i0.wp.com/truthvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-truthvoice-logo21-1.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Marijuana https://truthvoice.com 32 32 194740597 Denver Cops Raided Legal Cannabis Growers With Grenades, Machine Guns, Armored Vehicles https://truthvoice.com/2016/01/denver-cops-raided-legal-cannabis-growers-with-grenades-machine-guns-armored-vehicles/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=denver-cops-raided-legal-cannabis-growers-with-grenades-machine-guns-armored-vehicles Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:48:11 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2016/01/denver-cops-raided-legal-cannabis-growers-with-grenades-machine-guns-armored-vehicles/

Denver_Police_seize_illegal_marijuana_gr_1477700000_3967055_ver1.0_640_480

Three roommates who grew medical marijuana are suing two law enforcement agencies after their rural Conifer home was raided “military-style” with armored vehicles, machine guns and flash grenades.

A year after the raid, none of the three has been charged with a crime, and they have received minimal response from Denver police and Jefferson County sheriff’s officials about why they confiscated $70,000, 28 firearms and a pickup, their attorney said.

“We have heard pretty much silence from the authorities on our requests for further information,” said Rob Corry, an attorney with The Cannabis Law Firm. “Our clients are innocent of any criminal wrongdoing whatsoever. This is a significant amount of property and they’d like to get it back.”

Denver police spokeswoman Christine Downs said the criminal investigation is ongoing and that she could not comment on the lawsuit. Jefferson County sheriff’s officials did not respond to a request for comment Friday.

Heavily armed SWAT officers knocked in doors and threw flash grenades during the Jan. 23, 2015, raid, according to the lawsuit filed Thursday. Officers “assaulted” dogs at the “peaceful mountain home” and destroyed more than 350 marijuana plants.

Derek Smith and Shannon Riley, who are engaged, and their roommate Eric Hepper grew medical marijuana and sold it to Vietnam War veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder as well as cancer patients, their lawsuit says.

The Colorado constitution allows residents to grow medical marijuana for more than five patients when there is not a dispensary within a reasonable distance from their homes, according to the lawsuit. It also allows residents to grow as many plants as their patients’ doctors recommend.

In a search warrant affidavit, Denver police said they were working with a confidential informant before the raid.

“This is rural Colorado,” Corry said. “There is no law against cash and there is definitely no law against guns.”

]]>
2142
VIDEO: Raging Cop Claims to Smell Weed, So He Beat and Arrested an Innocent Teen https://truthvoice.com/2015/11/video-raging-cop-claims-to-smell-weed-so-he-beat-and-arrested-an-innocent-teen/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=video-raging-cop-claims-to-smell-weed-so-he-beat-and-arrested-an-innocent-teen Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:42:09 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/11/video-raging-cop-claims-to-smell-weed-so-he-beat-and-arrested-an-innocent-teen/

Matt Agorist writes on Alternet:

Orlando, FL — Ryan Richard Diaz and two of his friends were huddling under the corner of a parking garage last July, trying to get out of the rain, when they were approached by officer Michael Napolitano.

Officer Napolitano was allegedly responding to a call of some teens “smoking marijuana.” However, no marijuana would be found on any of those involved in Napolitano’s stop.

According to a lawsuit filed this week, when Napolitano arrived he became very aggressive which compelled Diaz’s friend, Mario Manzi, to begin film.

Napolitano became irate after seeing these teens practicing their 1st amendment right to film the police; so, he proceeded to violate their rights by stopping them.

As Napolitano attempted to grab the phone, the teens began passing the phone off to each other. This behavior infuriated the already raging Napolitano, so he then resorted to his only available tactic — violence.

Because the teens didn’t immediate prostrate themselves before his divine authority, Napolitano struck Diaz in the stomach with his knee multiple times and threw him to the ground. While on the ground, the video shows Napolitano continue to dole out blows to Diaz’s legs and head.

During the melee, you can hear Napolitano attempt to take the phone several times.

When told by one of the teens that he cannot take their phone, Napolitano answers, “You don’t understand how this works. When you are detained, you do not run the show.”

“You cannot grab my camera,” one of them then says.

Napolitano’s answer, “Yes, I can.”

The other two teens involved were then molested by Napolitano as he searched them for the non-existent plant.

The entirely unscathed Napolitano then accused Diaz of battery on a law enforcement officer and arrested him. Prosecutors dropped the battery charges but, unfortunately, they held a lesser charge of resisting arrest without violence in October.

Diaz and his friends had committed no crime, they had harmed no one, yet they were subject to state-sponsored violence and harassment because a cop claimed to have “smelled marijuana.”

“This kid is 5-6, 130 pounds, and his only crime is being at the wrong place at the wrong time and trying to video-record a police officer,” said his attorney, J. Marc Jones.

Unsurprisingly, officer Napolitano faced no punishment and, in fact, received support from his superiors for his actions.

According to the Orlando Sentinel, police Cpl. Joseph Catanzaro reviewed video of what happened, talked to Diaz and his friends and concluded that Napolitano’s use of force was justified.

The video below shows a symptom of much larger sickness in America today. The state is addicted to controlling what individuals can and can’t put into their own bodies. In an ostensible attempt to protect individuals from themselves, the state will kidnap, cage, and kill you — for your own good.

If you are truly concerned about reducing the level of brutality among American cops, you cannot be taken seriously unless you address the war on drugs.

Screen Shot 2015-11-03 at 1.01.56 PM

]]>
1988
It’s Time Again For The Yearly Lies From Cops About Halloween Candy https://truthvoice.com/2015/10/its-time-again-for-the-yearly-lies-from-cops-about-halloween-candy/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=its-time-again-for-the-yearly-lies-from-cops-about-halloween-candy Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:27:07 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/10/its-time-again-for-the-yearly-lies-from-cops-about-halloween-candy/

With Halloween just around the corner, it’s time for scary news reports that begin, “With Halloween just around the corner…” This genre of yellow journalism often features warnings about tainted trick-or-treat candy, a mythical menace that in recent years has gained credibility thanks to the popularity of  marijuana edibles in states where such products are legal.

Last year police in Denver, where state-licensed marijuana merchants had recently begun serving recreational consumers, told parents to be on the lookout for THC-tainted treats in their children’s candy bags. As usual, no actual cases of such surreptitious dosing were identified.

From Denver PD

From Denver PD

But fear of strangers with candy springs eternal. The fact that this threat so far has proven imaginary is not deterring reporters and law enforcement officials around the country from warning parents that harmless-looking treats might contain a mind-altering substance other than sugar—if not marijuana, then MDMA.

Often the pretext for such reports is a drug seizure that occurs within a month or so of Halloween, even if there’s no evidence of a connection to the holiday. Last month KTRK, the ABC station in Houston, reported that “a recent pot bust has authorities issuing a warning for parents, as Halloween approaches,” because local drug agents had “learned that marijuana made into candy was being shipped across state lines.” A few days later, after Orangeburg County, South Carolina, deputies found “several bags of marijuana-infused candy” in a local motel room, Sheriff Leroy Ravenell said “we need to pay close attention to the candy our children are in contact with and are consuming.” Summarizing that report (which appeared on WLTX, the CBS station in Columbia), USA Today added the lead, “Just in time for Halloween…”

Atlantic Beach Police DepartmentSimilarly, The Florida Times Union warned on October 14 that “Atlantic Beach parents may have another thing to worry about as Halloween trick-or-treating looms—candy infused with marijuana, as discovered following the recent arrest of a 33-year-old man with bags of it.” Last week, after students at Miller High School in Miller, Missouri, were caught with THC-treated Skittles, Superintendent Dustin Storm also thought of Halloween, telling parents, “With Halloween coming up, it’s very important to be observant.”

In other cases, warnings about marijuana-infused Halloween candy are not tied to any particular event; they are just part of the standard advice issued to parents in October.  On October 15, citing the Arizona Poison and Drug Information Center, the Arizona Daily Star said parents of treat-or-treaters should “be on the lookout for any edible marijuana treats.” Last week several Nebraska newspapers regurgitated a warning from the Nebraska Poison Control Center saying marijuana edibles that “resemble traditional candies” are “another good reason to check all your children’s candy when they get home.” Similarly, WITN, the NBC station in Greenville, North Carolina, warned viewers that “tricky packaging could land marijuana edibles in the hands of trick-or-treaters this Halloween.” KTHV, the ABC station in Little Rock, Arkansas, reported that “police want parents to pay extra attention to the Halloween candy their kids collect this year, now that marijuana edibles are in circulation.”

Reporters in Colorado have been a bit more cautious, presumably because they remember last year’s false alarm about edibles sold by marijuana merchants in that state. Last Friday The Denver Post noted that “the initial concern last year over marijuana edibles ending up in Halloween candy never came to pass.” KOAA, the NBC station in Colorado Springs, likewise conceded that authorities “have not seen a spike of accidental [marijuana] ingestion at Halloween.” Still, you never know. “One of the big things with cannabis-containing candies, it does have a distinct smell,” a local doctor told the station, saying parents should be “making sure you’re looking at everything and making sure the packaging looks legitimate.”

Almost all of these stories make a leap from the observation that cannabis candy exists to the completely unsubstantiated fear that someone might slip it into your kid’s trick-or-treat bag. That scenario is highly implausible, since it is hard to see what the payoff would be for replacing cheap Halloween treats with expensive marijuana edibles. Given the delay between eating cannabis candy and feeling its effects, the hypothetical prankster could not even hope to witness the consequences of his trick. Furthermore, it seems that nothing like this has ever happened—or if it did, it somehow escaped the attention of the yellow journalists who keep warning us about the possibility. The story is kept alive by the gullibility of the same parents who anxiously examine their kid’s Halloween candy for needles and shards of glass.

Molly-tablets-Jackson-PD

Jackson Metro Police Department

Jackson Metro Police DepartmentThis year saw the birth of a new variation on this theme: Instead of cannabis in your kids’ candy, maybe there’s MDMA. Snopes.com, the online catalog of urban legends, traces the scare to a September 25 post by a Facebook user named Thomas Chizzo Bagwell featuring a photo of colorful Molly tablets. “If your kids get these for halloween,” Bagwell wrote, “it’s not candy.” Last week the Jackson, Mississippi, police department posted the same photo, accompanied by this warning:

If your kids get these for Halloween candy, they ARE NOT CANDY!!! They are the new shapes of “Ecstasy” and can kill kids through overdoses!!! So, check your kid’s candy and “When in doubt, Throw it out!!!” Be safe and always keep the shiny side up!!!

That burst of fact-free fear, which was later removed from the police department’s Facebook page, transformed idle speculation into “an alert” issued by “police nationwide,” as WILX, the NBC station in Lansing, Michigan, put it. WOIO, the CBS station in Cleveland, claimed “Ecstasy masked to look like candy” is “popping up all over the country, and police want to warn you.” If a child were to eat one of those tablets, according to Westlake, Ohio, Police Capt. Guy Turner, “they would be in the emergency room without a doubt.”

Why does Turner think that scenario is plausible? “Look at the colors,” he told WOIO. “They’re very similar to, like, Sweet Tarts or Sprees or Smarties. These people, they just piggyback off legitimate stuff.”

Snopes.com writer Kim LaCapria notes that candy-colored MDMA tablets have been around for years. “As is often the case with such rumors,” she writes, “the public seemed to conflate the existence of a drug that looked child-friendly…with deliberate manufacture of those substances with an intent to attract children. Prior to its September 2015 circulation on social media as a cautionary tale, the photograph of Ecstasy used here appeared primarily on blogs discussing (presumably adult) recreational drug use.”

One widely carried TV report, credited to NBC, said “just one of those candy pills would cost about $10,” which suggests “it’s rare that it would pop up in your child’s trick-or-treat bag.” Still, “police do want you to be aware.” In other words, there is no evidence that anyone has ever contemplated giving trick-or-treaters MDMA tablets, let alone actually done it, but you should worry about it anyway.

Child poisoners disguised as friendly neighbors seem to be the adult equivalent of witches, ghosts, vampires, werewolves, and zombies. As one randomly selected mother told WOIO, “It’s really scary that there are people out there who want to hurt kids on Halloween.” And who doesn’t love a good scare this time of year?

From Reason.com

]]>
1667
Court Rules Cops Wrong To Seize Car Over $20 Of Weed, But There is More https://truthvoice.com/2015/10/court-rules-cops-wrong-to-seize-car-over-20-of-weed-but-there-is-more/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=court-rules-cops-wrong-to-seize-car-over-20-of-weed-but-there-is-more Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:25:51 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/10/court-rules-cops-wrong-to-seize-car-over-20-of-weed-but-there-is-more/
The Business of Marijuana

The Business of Marijuana

For nearly three years, Linda Ross, 26, has been fighting the seizure of her vehicle, which police took after finding a small amount of marijuana inside. It’s a legal battle that’s dragged on long after Ross learned that cops in Westland, Michigan, had already sold her 2007 Ford Focus, even though she was still in the process of appealing to get it back.

A police officer first seized the car in January 2013, when Ross says he pulled her over after a shift delivering pizzas and found her in possession of a gram of weed. She couldn’t believe it when the officer told her he was going to impound her vehicle over it.

“It felt like a nightmare — like I was actually being kidnapped and robbed,” she told The Huffington Post. “It was so shocking to see that he was taking my car so fast. Within a minute or two, he literally drove it away. He radioed in an officer and he came down and they drove it away.”

Months later, police made a move to take the car for good, claiming Ross had used it in the commission of a crime: buying $20 of weed. That’s justifiable under the state’s laws on civil asset forfeiture, a process by which law enforcement can permanently seize property or cash they suspect of being connected to criminal activity without charging the owner with a crime. That property — which can include cars, houses and jewelry — is then regularly sold off, with some of the proceeds flowing back to the departments that seized it. Ross’ lawyer eventually told her that’s what happened to her Focus as their case was working its way through the courts.

Last week, Ross finally received some satisfaction, when a Michigan court of appeals found that police were wrong to take her car in the first place, overturning a previous decision that had approved its forfeiture. The judges, however, didn’t rule in Ross’ favor because it seems outrageous to seize someone’s car simply because it was used to buy a gram of weed. Instead, they said it was how Ross got the marijuana that made all the difference.

In a 2-1 decision, the majority wrote that because a customer had supposedly given Ross the weed as a tip for a pizza delivery — and that she hadn’t actually driven her car with the intent of purchasing drugs — the vehicle wasn’t subject to forfeiture.

“Despite Linda’s testimony that she sometimes received marijuana as a tip from various customers, there was no evidence that she expected to receive it on this particular occasion, that this particular customer had given her marijuana before, or that she was motivated to go to the customer’s house by anything other than a delivery call,” read the ruling.

The judges went on to note that simple marijuana possession is not grounds for seizure or forfeiture and that a previous ruling had erred in concluding that the presence of weed in Ross’ car meant she’d used the vehicle for the express purpose of obtaining the drugs.

“According to plaintiff and the trial court’s perspective, the fact that ‘the car was used to receive marijuana’ because marijuana was placed into it established — on its own — that Linda used the vehicle for the purpose of receiving marijuana,” they wrote. “By that logic, a vehicle would be subject to forfeiture in all cases of mere possession.”

Barring another round of appeals, Ross may finally be able to claim victory. Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor Maria Miller told The Detroit News that her office is currently reviewing its options.

But with her car already gone, that victory will be bittersweet at best. Ross and her lawyer are considering further action for compensation, meaning more court dates, more legal fees and more headaches. But for Ross, the damage is more than monetary.

“There’s no closure. I feel so bad, like I’m such a terrible kid to my parents,” said Ross. “Without them, without their vehicles and money to get a lawyer, I would be nowhere. And thank god for my job. My bosses completely knew this was wrong. They didn’t even know me that well, but they still stood by my side and I still work there today.”

Ross’ case comes on the heels of a much broader debate about civil asset forfeiture in Michigan. Last week, state lawmakers overwhelmingly approved a seven-bill package designed to address some of the core criticism of the controversial legal process. Among them is a measure to raise the standard of proof needed for forfeiture, which would require police to establish “clear and convincing” evidence that property was related to a crime before enacting proceedings. Another would require law enforcement agencies to keep and submit detailed records of their forfeiture cases. The legislation is now on the desk of Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R).

Michigan’s reform effort has been reinforced by statewide reporting that suggests civil asset forfeiture is routinely used — and sometimes abused — by law enforcement agencies across the state. Critics say the practice provides a profit motive for officers to prioritize seizures over public safety.

In 2014, police in Michigan reported seizing nearly $24 million in assets in cases involving suspected drug dealers, about the same total as the previous year. But these numbers have been criticized as incomplete. Reporting has traditionally been optional for police departments in Michigan, and many opted not to submit their numbers. Documentation also included only drug cases, leaving out forfeitures tied to other sorts of crimes.

While the recent reforms have been hailed as an important step forward, none of them would explicitly prohibit police from seizing a car from someone they could prove had, in fact, driven to purchase $20 of weed. Ross’ fight still underscores the injustice of out-of-control civil asset forfeiture and the need for reform, said Holly Harris, executive director for Fix Forfeiture, an organization that has worked on overhauling laws in Michigan and other states.

“When you take a person’s car or home away, you remove their ability to get to their jobs, care for their children and be productive citizens,” Harris said. “The collateral consequences to these forfeitures are extremely harmful to society — far more harmful in this case than the underlying act committed by the property owner.”

CORRECTION: This article originally said Ross was stopped and her car was seized in April 2013; that was actually the date of the initial forfeiture motion. The incident took place in January, Ross said.

Published by Huffington Post

]]>
1627
New Federal Bill Would End Marijuana Forfeiture Slush Fund https://truthvoice.com/2015/09/new-federal-bill-would-end-marijuana-forfeiture-slush-fund/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=new-federal-bill-would-end-marijuana-forfeiture-slush-fund Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:17:52 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/09/new-federal-bill-would-end-marijuana-forfeiture-slush-fund/
The Business of Marijuana

The Business of Marijuana

A sweet new bill with bipartisan support is seeking to cut off all funding for the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) generated through asset seizures.

According to Forbes, The “Stop Civil Asset Forfeiture Funding for Marijuana Suppression Act” was introduced mid-September by (D) California Representative Ted Lieu, and (R) Michigan Representative Justin Amash. The DEA’s new legislative nemesis would work like this; the bill would preclude the DEA from utilizing any and all federal forfeiture resources to further its domestic campaign of terror, a.k.a. the Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Program.

In 1979, Hawaii and California were the first states to feel the sting of the feds new tool used in the War on Drugs. Shortly thereafter, the Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Act had spread like a disease throughout all 50 states in the US. Since it’s unfortunate introduction, the program has been responsible for widespread misery from coast-to-coast; in 2014 alone there were 6,310 arrests, $27.3 million seized, and more than 4.3 million plants destroyed. Currently, the asset-freezing program collects approximately $18 million annually in federal funding, largely from accused marijuana cultivators and their distributors.

What has people concerned over this money-grab of a program is the bulk of its asset seizures are anything but criminal. Rather most of these transgressions are civil in nature. In the real world, an individual must be convicted of a crime for criminal forfeiture to occur. Unfortunately, civil forfeiture lacks the requirement of any conviction or criminal charge for the federal government to grab your personal assets, cash, or other items of monetary value.

The ugliest and most simplistic explanation of civil forfeiture is this, the police aren’t required to demonstrate you’re guilty of anything to seize your property … However, you will need to prove your lack of guilt to get it back.

This newest bill is similar to another defensive piece of legislation passed last year, an amendment authored by (D) California Rep. Sam Farr and (R) California Rep. Dana Rohrbacher. Their anti-seizure legislation was added to the 2014 and 2015 Omnibus Appropriations Spending Bill. Working towards the same goal, their amendment banned the use of any federally seized assets from being utilized for raids in states that have reformed their marijuana laws.

The most notable change in the newly offered Bill, is the new program would provide a permanent fix to problem of overzealous federal government illegally grabbing cash from those legally operating a marijuana business in states that are sanctioned their operations. Rather than having to renew each year by vote the Omnibus Appropriations Spending Bill.

*Not one to miss an opportunity to shine the light of irony of our legal system, John Oliver rips into the unjust nature of civil forfeiture in the below video.

From Marijuana.com
]]>
1474
Snoop Dogg Arrested In Sweden Because Cops Assumed He Was High https://truthvoice.com/2015/07/snoop-dogg-arrested-in-sweden-because-cops-assumed-he-was-high/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=snoop-dogg-arrested-in-sweden-because-cops-assumed-he-was-high Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:04:44 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/07/snoop-dogg-arrested-in-sweden-because-cops-assumed-he-was-high/
snoop-dogg

Legendary hip-hop artist Snoop Dogg

According to a report from Agence France-Presse, famous hip-hop artist Snoop Dogg was detained by police in Sweden on Saturday night after they suspected him of using illegal drugs.

“Police carrying out roadside controls noticed that Snoop Dogg (whose car was pulled over) seemed to be under the influence of narcotics. He was arrested and taken to the police station to take a urine test,” said Daniel Nilsson, a police spokesman for the central Uppsala region.

“The incident lasted several minutes. Once the test was carried out he left,” Nilsson added.

Swedish police did not give details on how they knew the rapper was under the influence of drugs, given that the vehicle he was in was not in operation when they approached him.

According to the report, Snoop Dogg was arrested after performing at a concert Saturday evening. The encounter does not appear to have occurred violently.

Results of the drug test were not available at the time of writing.

]]>
1154
UPDATE: Second Raid On Dispensary Where Cops Stole Pot Cookies, Sabotaged Security https://truthvoice.com/2015/06/santa-ana-cops-steal-pot-cookies-sabotage-security-abuse-amputee/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=santa-ana-cops-steal-pot-cookies-sabotage-security-abuse-amputee Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:56:42 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/06/santa-ana-cops-steal-pot-cookies-sabotage-security-abuse-amputee/

nub-kick

UPDATE @ 7/10/2015 1:50 AM: According to a report from the OC Register, police conducted a second, separate raid of the dispensary after police were caught on video attempting to disable security, stealing and eating marijuana edibles, and mocking the dispensary’s disabled manager.

The OC Register reports:

“Several employees at a Santa Ana medical marijuana clinic were briefly detained Wednesday after police converged on the collective for the second time in less than two months and shut it down.

“The closure followed the execution of a search warrant at the Sky High Holistic dispensary for violating a city ordinance prohibiting dispensaries, Santa Ana police Cpl. Anthony Bertagna said.”

SANTA ANA, Calif. — Santa Ana police are under fire and facing possible litigation for their behavior while storming a medical marijuana dispensary, after a recording was released that shows two officers making racist comments and berating an amputee, as well as stealing cannabis edibles and attempting to disable surveillance cameras.

Hidden surveillance cameras recorded the event at the Sky High medical marijuana dispensary. The cameras were installed by the owners, who expected to be raided after their dispensary failed to win the ‘lottery’ that grants 20 dispensaries a license to operate in the city.

David Pappas, the attorney hired by the dispensary, instructed his clients to remain calm and cooperate with the police. After the raid, Pappas released video of the incident that shows officers attempting to disable the surveillance cameras and stealing pot-infused cookies. It also captured the following dialogue:

“Did you punch that one-legged old benita?”

“I was about to kick her in her fucking nub!”

A video of police making the comments is available below:

Santa Ana Police Chief Carlos Rojas said his own department will be investigating the incident, but proposed the unlikely excuse that an officer may have brought a cookie with him to eat, rather than stealing a marijuana edible from the dispensary.

“I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?”

Santa Ana Police Chief Carlos Rojas

Santa Ana Police Chief Carlos Rojas

More video of the officers, which includes them playing darts and joking about the raid, is available below:

]]>
908
Cops Raid Marijuana Dispensary, Destroy Surveillance Equipment, Eat Pot Brownies, Joke About Assaulting Amputee https://truthvoice.com/2015/06/cops-raid-marijuana-dispensary-destroy-surveillance-equipment-eat-pot-brownies-joke-about-assaulting-amputee/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cops-raid-marijuana-dispensary-destroy-surveillance-equipment-eat-pot-brownies-joke-about-assaulting-amputee Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:52:00 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/06/cops-raid-marijuana-dispensary-destroy-surveillance-equipment-eat-pot-brownies-joke-about-assaulting-amputee/

Our friends from Reason Magazine report that armed cops in Santa Ana, California, donned ski masks to break and enter into a local medical marijuana dispensary, raiding it with guns drawn in a May 27 police action. They then proceeded to remove surveillance cameras and recording equipment, but they didn’t remove it all. Video from a camera they didn’t disable also caught the officers eating what appear to be marijuana edibles, then acting in a way to suggest they had become intoxicated, with one officer even joking that she’d love to kick a marijuana activist present at the raid, Marla James, an amputee, in the “nub.”

Watch one of the videos, via Orange County Weekly, below:

As OC Weekly reports, the dispensary that was raided, the Sky High Collective, was one of several in Santa Ana that was not selected in a lottery process in February that permitted a limited number of dispensaries to operate. Via the OC Weekly blog:

James and her husband David told the Weekly that they were present at Sky High because their attorney Matt Pappas, had learned the collective would be raided from Santa Ana’s city attorney, Sonia Carvalho.”

“When they came back into the back room when David and I were, they asked us why we were there, and I told them we were there to observe them, the police,” James recalled. “And they were really surprised about that.” When James told the officers that “Sonia” had told her attorney about the raid, the officers didn’t recognize the name. “They had no idea and it made them seem kind of stupid and maybe that’s why they got mad.”

James struggled to understand why the female officer in the video would make fun of her disability.

“You know what, I was really nice to that woman,” James said. “I even complimented her on her hair. I treated that woman with respect and I have no idea why she wanted to kick my stump.”

The police department insists the video that was made public was edited and not in chronological order, and have started an internal investigation, saying they hope unedited video will give them a “clearer picture” of what happened.

As other states move to legalize marijuana more forcefully and clearly than California has over the last twenty years, the problem of licensing shouldn’t be ignored. Where the government legalizes marijuana by creating a legalized monopoly or cartel, they are keeping significant numbers of non-violent people out of the legal framework and in the crosshairs of authorities.

Marijuana raid

]]>
779
Maryland Governor Cites Heroin as Reason for Vetoing Cannabis Reform Bill https://truthvoice.com/2015/05/maryland-governor-cites-heroin-as-reason-for-vetoing-cannabis-reform-bill/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=maryland-governor-cites-heroin-as-reason-for-vetoing-cannabis-reform-bill Sun, 24 May 2015 08:41:32 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/05/maryland-governor-cites-heroin-as-reason-for-vetoing-cannabis-reform-bill/
maryland-governor-hogan

Maryland Governor Larry Hogan

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Governor Larry Hogan (R-MD) vetoed three bills on Friday that contained major criminal justice reforms, including one which reduced penalties related to cannabis use.

SB 517 contained legislation to reduce marijuana paraphernalia penalties to a civil offense. The governor also vetoed two other bills: SB 528, which would have limited asset forfeiture seized by police, and HB 980, which would have restored the right to vote to felons who have been released from prison.

Hogan explained in a letter to legislators that his decision to veto the bills was based on requests from Maryland police unions, including the Maryland Sheriffs’ Association and the Maryland Chiefs of Police Association. Both organizations have campaigned against legislative reforms to asset forfeiture and cannabis possession penalties.

The actual explanation given by Hogan for his veto of the cannabis reform bill bafflingly referenced heroin addiction as factor in the governor’s reasoning.

“Maryland is currently facing a heroin epidemic. The individuals involved in the manufacture and sale of drugs are profiting from the deaths and ruined lives they are creating. The asset forfeiture law helps to ensure that these criminals do not reap any economic benefits from their crimes.”

— Maryland Governor Larry Hogan

Hogan made no comment about the benefits and funding the state of Maryland receives as a result of drug criminalization.

A study by the ACLU on marijuana arrests between 2001 and 2010 concluded that the state of Maryland had one of the highest arrest rates for marijuana possession. Baltimore in particular was found to have an arrest rate of approximately 11.4 arrests per 1,000 people, among the highest in the US.

]]>
572
NH Governor Ambushed by Independent Journalists With Questions About Marijuana https://truthvoice.com/2015/05/nh-governor-ambushed-by-independent-journalists-with-questions-about-marijuana/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nh-governor-ambushed-by-independent-journalists-with-questions-about-marijuana Sat, 09 May 2015 11:19:52 +0000 http://truthvoice.com/2015/05/nh-governor-ambushed-by-independent-journalists-with-questions-about-marijuana/

This afternoon the hypocrite governor of New Hampshire spoke at Keene State College’s 2015 graduation ceremony.  Maggie Hassan, the boss of the state’s executive branch, is likely to veto the cannabis decrim bill if it makes it through the NH senate.  It already passed the NH house with a supermajority of votes.  It’s clear that decriminalization is what the people of New Hampshire want (it’s also the humane choice), but Hassan throws her loyalty into the camp of the police and cares not one bit about the lives that continue to be ruined because of her inhumane war on pot.

Oh, and to make her position even more outrageous, it turns out she herself has used cannabis in her college days.  That raging hypocrisy didn’t stop her from showing up at Keene State College and acting like she actually gives a damn about the very same students that her police regularly threaten and harass over victimless crimes like cannabis and alcohol possession.  Rich Paul and I went down to KSC today to confront her on these things and were accompanied by local education activist Ed Bryans who was upset with Hassan’s veto of the anti-common core bill. We found her at the end of the commencement and had plenty of time to give her a hard time while she was unable to leave, much to the dismay of a few of her sycophants. Here’s the video:

It’s not too late for cannabis decrim to pass, but Hassan and the NH senators need to hear from you. Please reach out to your senator here and ask them to support HB618, the cannabis decriminalization bill. Then please call Hassan’s office and encourage her to do the right thing and let decrim pass.

Authored by Ian Freeman for http://freekeene.com

 

New Hampshire Governor

]]>
3284